I think I should also say that I, too, care deeply about truth. I went into my philosophy major with the honest desire to discover "the meaning of life."

But I think there are different ways to pursue truth, and different schools of truth to pursue.

I think scientific truth can often be very important and it should be pursued.

But - I think without a set of values that guide how science is applied things can go awry very quickly.

And finding those values or some truth about those values is more the type of truth that I care about.

In discovering ethical truths I feel religion can be very helpful and that less quantifiable human experience and things like religion are more helpful in discovering ethical truths which decide how we apply scientific truths.

Philosophy and logical argument are helpful too, but most philosophical ethical arguments will at one point come down to a discussion of something unquantifiable - the "good". Good isn't something you can measure on an instrument or see with your eyes. No matter how logical the arguments, it's something that we come across on the intuitive level. Unless, of course, you don't believe there is a good. And that's a defensible argument.

But most of us do go through the world believing that something is better than another thing in any given decision and most of us can tell the difference between something which is merely good for us and something which is good for the world.

I find religion particularly useful here, because there are points on which most major religions agree - that we should love one another, forgive, that we should treat others as we would like to be treated, that we shouldn't kill (not that most religions actually remember to PRACTICE this last one). But the ideals expressed in these belief systems are good starting points for talks about ethical truths.

And I'm still trying to find the meaning of life, or at least a good set of guidelines...